New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. ÌýYou can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
WELCOME BACK
Plasma proteomics and carotid intima-media thickness in the UK biobank cohort.
ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½
Plasma proteomics and carotid intima-media thickness in the UK biobank cohort. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine Chen, M. L., Kho, P. F., Guarischi-Sousa, R., Zhou, J., Panyard, D. J., Azizi, Z., Gupte, T., Watson, K., Abbasi, F., Assimes, T. L. 2024; 11: 1478600Abstract
Ultrasound derived carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is valuable for cardiovascular risk stratification. We assessed the relative importance of traditional atherosclerosis risk factors and plasma proteins in predicting cIMT measured nearly a decade later.We examined 6,136 UK Biobank participants with 1,461 proteins profiled using the proximity extension assay applied to their baseline blood draw who subsequently underwent a cIMT measurement. We implemented linear regression, stepwise Akaike Information Criterion-based, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models to identify potential proteomic as well as non-proteomic predictors. We evaluated our model performance using the proportion variance explained (R 2).The mean time from baseline assessment to cIMT measurement was 9.2 years. Age, blood pressure, and anthropometric related variables were the strongest predictors of cIMT with fat-free mass index of the truncal region being the strongest predictor among adiposity measurements. A LASSO model incorporating variables including age, assessment center, genetic risk factors, smoking, blood pressure, trunk fat-free mass index, apolipoprotein B, and Townsend deprivation index combined with 97 proteins achieved the highest R 2 (0.308, 95% C.I. 0.274, 0.341). In contrast, models built with proteins alone or non-proteomic variables alone explained a notably lower R 2 (0.261, 0.228-0.294 and 0.260, 0.226-0.293, respectively). Chromogranin b (CHGB), Cystatin-M/E (CST6), leptin (LEP), and prolargin (PRELP) were the proteins consistently selected across all models.Plasma proteins add to the clinical and genetic risk factors in predicting a cIMT measurement. Our findings implicate blood pressure and extracellular matrix-related proteins in cIMT pathophysiology.
View details for
View details for
View details for