New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. ÌýYou can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
WELCOME BACK
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Radiologists' Reading Time in Bone Age Radiograph Assessment: A Preliminary Retrospective Observational Study.
ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Radiologists' Reading Time in Bone Age Radiograph Assessment: A Preliminary Retrospective Observational Study. Journal of imaging informatics in medicine Jeong, S., Han, K., Kang, Y., Kim, E. K., Song, K., Vasanawala, S., Shin, H. J. 2024Abstract
To evaluate the real-world impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on radiologists' reading time during bone age (BA) radiograph assessments. Patients (<19 year-old) who underwent left-hand BA radiographs between December 2021 and October 2023 were retrospectively included. A commercial AI software was installed from October 2022. Radiologists' reading times, automatically recorded in the PACS log, were compared between the AI-unaided and AI-aided periods using linear regression tests and factors affecting reading time were identified. A total of 3643 radiographs (M:F=1295:2348, mean age 9.12 ± 2.31 years) were included and read by three radiologists, with 2937 radiographs (80.6%) in the AI-aided period. Overall reading times were significantly shorter in the AI-aided period compared to the AI-unaided period (mean 17.2 ± 12.9 seconds vs. mean 22.3 ± 14.7 seconds, p < 0.001). Staff reading times significantly decreased in the AI-aided period (mean 15.9 ± 11.4 seconds vs. mean 19.9 ± 13.4 seconds, p < 0.001), while resident reading times increased (mean 38.3 ± 16.4 seconds vs. 33.6 ± 15.3 seconds, p = 0.013). The use of AI and years of experience in radiology were significant factors affecting reading time (all, p=0.001). The degree of decrease in reading time as experience increased was larger when utilizing AI (-1.151 for AI-unaided, -1.866 for AI-aided, difference =-0.715, p<0.001). In terms of AI exposure time, the staff's reading time decreased by 0.62 seconds per month (standard error 0.07, p<0.001) during the AI-aided period. The reading time of radiologists for BA assessment was influenced by AI. The time-saving effect of utilizing AI became more pronounced as the radiologists' experience and AI exposure time increased.
View details for
View details for
View details for