Indications, complications and outcomes of minimally-invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion with anterior column realignment vs. standard LLIF using expandable interbody spacers.

ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½

Abstract

Anterior column realignment (ACR), using a lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) approach to release the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL), is a powerful technique to increase segmental lordosis. We here report our experience with the use of expandible LLIF cages for ACR.Retrospective, single-center observational cohort study including consecutive patients treated by LLIF using an expandible interbody implant. Patients with ACR were compared to patients without ACR. Our outcomes include adverse events (AEs), radiological (segmental sagittal cobb angle, spinopelvic parameters) and clinical outcomes until 12 months postoperative.We identified 503 patients, in which we performed LLIF at 732 levels. In 63 patients (12.5%) and 70 levels (9.6%) an expandable cage was used. Of those, in 30 patients (47.6%) and 30 levels, the ALL was released (42.8%). Age (mean 61.4 years), sex (57.1% female), comorbidities and further demographic features were similar, but patients in the ACR group had a higher anesthesiologic risk, were more frequently operated for degenerative deformity and had a more severely dysbalanced spine (all p?7 levels). Intraoperative AEs occurred in 3.3% (ACR) and 3.0% (no ACR; p?=?0.945). In ACR cases, mean segmental lordosis changed from -2.8° (preoperative) to 16.4° (discharge; p??0.05)]. Total lumbar lordosis increased from 27.8° to 45.2° (discharge; p??0.05) and no pseudarthrosis at the LLIF level was noted.ACR using an expandible LLIF interbody implant was safe, promoted solid fusion and restored significantly more segmental lordosis compared to LLIF without ALL release, which was maintained during follow-up.

View details for

View details for

View details for