New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. ÌýYou can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
WELCOME BACK
3D-printed needle guides for cervical cancer brachytherapy: Optimized dosimetry and improved local control outcomes.
ÌÇÐÄ´«Ã½
3D-printed needle guides for cervical cancer brachytherapy: Optimized dosimetry and improved local control outcomes. Brachytherapy Butler, S., Niedermayr, T., Kidd, E. A. 2025Abstract
We previously designed three-dimensionally-printed needle guides (3D-NG) for cervical cancer brachytherapy, which improved procedure efficiency and tumor coverage while achieving similar organs at risk (OAR) sparing compared to non-3D-printed techniques (non-3D). The subject of this study was whether 3D-NG can help improve local control and other brachytherapy outcomes.This single institution cohort study includes 130 patients who underwent definitive external-beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate intracavitary +/- interstitial brachytherapy from February 2017 to July 2023. 3D-NG were implemented for all cases after December 2019 (N?=?77). Non-3D included applicator-only/no-needles (N?=?28) or freehand-placed needles (N?=?25).Median follow-up was 24 months. 3D-NG, versus non-3D, achieved higher mean D90 (+5.2?Gy, p?30 cubic-centimeters[cc]) (Pinteraction<0.10 for all). Maximum D2cc for all OAR were comparable between 3D-NG and non-3D (p?>?0.05). 2-year LF was lower with 3D-NG compared to non-3D (8.2% vs. 22.0%; aHR 0.31, p?=?0.036)-and compared to freehand-needles alone (8.2% vs. 20.6%, p?85?Gy; pinteraction?=?0.013) and lower HR-CTV volume (=30 cc; pinteraction?=?0.048). 2-year LF was also lower with concurrent cisplatin (aHR 0.20, p?=?0.001) and =40% decrease in tumor diameter after EBRT (aHR 0.16, p?=?0.010); but higher among minority race (aHR 4.21, p?=?0.06).3D-NG for cervix brachytherapy were associated with improved 2-year LF compared to non-3D/freehand-needles, with higher achievement of EMBRACE II goals for D90 and D98, with similar OAR doses. This study highlights the potential for 3D-NG to simplify needle insertion while simultaneously improving needle position, dosimetry, and disease control outcomes.
View details for
View details for